HashFlare VS Coinomia

UPDATED Feb. 2018

You can never know which coin can bring you the highest profits, but you can definitely choose your cloud mining company wisely and increase your chance of success. By narrowing your choice down to two excellent companies, you are just a step away from a potentially lucrative mining endeavor. This expert-made HashFlare VS Coinomia comparison will show you whether your instincts were right and tell you which one is the better choice.

Side by Side Comparison

Company Location
Founding Year
Mining Farms Locations
Supported Coins
Supported Algorithms
Daily Payouts
Minimum Payouts
Deposit Fee
Withdrawal Fee
Maintenance Fee
Electricity Fee
Contracts Offered
Contract Terms
Customer Support
Referral Program
Estonia
2015
Estonia
BTC, ETH, DASH, ZEC
SHA-256, SScrypt, Ethash, SHA-256, X11, Equinash
yes
0.0014 BTC, 0.0007 ETH, 0.0004 DASH
n/a
n/a
SHA-256: 0.0035 USD per 10 GH/s
Scrypt: 0.01 USD per every 1 MH/s
Ethereum: no fees
included in maintenace fee
See plans and pricing
lifetime - 1 year
email, phone
yes
UK
2014
China, India
BTC, ETH
X11
yes
no minimum
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
See plans and prcing
Open-ended
email, phone
yes

Ratings

This comparison is based on three objective criteria for cloud mining company selection. Transparency indicates the legitimateness of the business and its openness in communication with its clients. Reliability stands for the quality of the provided mining equipment, the stability of the mining farms, the functionality of the payout system, and other indicators of general performance. Profitability is a reflection of the performance and quality of the service provided on the success of your mining endeavor and it is carefully calculated based on a large pool of testing data. Here is the final result.

Transparency
Reliability
Profitability
Final Rating 9.5/10 7.4/10
Share: Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Email this to someone